Tuition fees: why Wales leads the way, by Malcolm Prowle

3 Dec 10
The Welsh Assembly Government has played a blinder in deciding not to raise tuition fees. It shows that Welsh politicians are more in touch with their constituents than their English counterparts

There have been several blogs (including my own) on the PF blog recently about the decision to alter the structure of higher education funding in England and impose much higher fees on university students.

But less attention has been given to the decision by the Welsh Assembly Government (WAG) not to raise fees for Welsh-domiciled students. This means that Welsh students will, for the present, continue to pay fees of £3,225 per annum irrespective of whether they attend a Welsh or English university.

This move has caused huge consternation in the right-wing media where English Tory and LibDem MPs will no doubt be concerned about how they will explain to their constituents why Welsh students will pay much lower fees than students living in their own constituencies.

I am not always a fan of the WAG but they have pulled off a blinder here. They seem to be aware of three things:-

  • Having an educated workforce is essential for the Welsh economy and tripling university fees would have a huge impact on the number of Welsh young people going to higher education. This had to be avoided at all costs.
  • Access to higher education is a very sensitive political and social issue in Wales and raising fees to the levels proposed in England was likely to be seen as a policy designed to deter students from working-class backgrounds from going to university.
  • The UK coalition government made great play about ‘protecting’ the NHS and schools budgets even though these are two areas of public service provision that have had a dismal track record of performance over the past 10-15 years. As a consequence they had to drastically chop the higher education budget to make ends meet. Wisely the Welsh Assembly Government did not go for the cheap headline of ‘protecting the NHS’ but chose its priorities carefully.

As I stated in my earlier blog the policy of dramatically increasing university fees might prove a disaster for the government and be likely to alienate both the poor and the middle classes at the same time.  The student protests might just be the start. It may also result in a disastrous electoral performance by the Liberal Democrats in the forthcoming by-election in Oldham East and Saddleworth generating a panic among LibDem MPs that could damage or destroy the coalition.

For me the key lesson is that the Welsh Assembly Government was closer to the people of Wales and had a good understanding of their hopes, aspirations and fears. On the other hand the UK government, closeted in offices in Whitehall, made decisions in almost complete ignorance of how people would react.

Even though there was a perfectly workable and more acceptable alternative approach to HE funding (ie the graduate tax) the government chose to be influenced by a small group of right-wing Tories hostile to a graduate tax and out of touch with the mass of the population.

Next time an English region gets the opportunity to have its own form of devolved government they should think carefully before saying no again. Welsh devolution is not perfect but, at least, Welsh politicians seem a bit more in touch with their constituents than is the case in England.

Malcolm Prowle is professor of business performance at Nottingham Business School and a visiting professor at the Open University Business School. He can be contacted via his web page www.malcolmprowle.com

Did you enjoy this article?

AddToAny

Top