The reality of revaluation, by Malcolm Prowle

27 Sep 10
The coalition government's decision to defer a council tax revaluation comes as no surprise. Ministers will have enough on their plates over the next few years, so why shoot themselves in the foot by creating more hostility and protest?

The coalition government’s decision to defer any council tax revaluation for the duration of this parliament comes as no surprise. Politicians meddle with existing taxation arrangements at their peril.

The fiasco in the 1980s and 1990s over the implementation of the poll tax (or community charge) is an indicator of what can happen. The shift from the rating system to the poll tax inevitably resulted in large-scale winners and losers. As is life, the winners pocketed their gains while the losers protested vigorously. Add the tax losers to those who were against the poll tax in principle and very quickly you have a mass protest which rocked the government.

A revaluation of property values could have a similar effect, with some streets or individual properties going up a band while others come down a band as a consequence of changes in the relative values of properties. Once again those who go down will probably keep quiet. while those who go up will protest.

Ministers will have enough on their plates over the next few years what with the state of the economy and the cutbacks in public spending. Why shoot themselves in the foot by creating yet more hostility and protest by initiating a council tax revaluation?

Some may argue that postponing such revaluations is unfair because it means that a person’s council tax is based on property valuations that are well out of date. This may be true, but one could also argue that property valuations are not a fair or progressive basis on which to raise tax revenue given that they have no link whatsoever to ability to pay – one of Adam Smith’s canons of a good tax system.

Others argue that avoiding a revaluation will bear hardest on the poor. However, Wales had a revaluation in 2005 and it is claimed that the hardest hit were those on the lowest bands, A to C, with something like two-thirds of the increases occurring in those bands. This might be thought to have hit poorer people harder than richer people but then, as I have already stressed, value of property is not necessarily an indicator of income, wealth or ability to pay.

Presumably we can’t go for ever without a property revaluation but, clearly, we aren’t going to get one for five years or so. Who knows – maybe by that time the government will have developed the vision to completely refashion local government finance in such a way as to have greater local discretion and accountability. Somehow I doubt it.

Malcolm Prowle is professor of business performance at Nottingham Business School and a visiting professor at the Open University Business. He can be contacted via his web page www.malcolmprowle.com

Did you enjoy this article?

AddToAny

Top