Why turkeys don’t vote for Christmas, by Max Wind-Cowie

24 Sep 09
MAX WIND-COWIE | David Walker’s response to Demos's call for greater freedom and trust for frontline services was not, entirely, unexpected. Whilst we do call for the Audit Commission to go, the report – Leading from the front – is a wider framework for reform

David Walker’s response to Demos's call for greater freedom and trust for frontline services was not entirely unexpected. Whilst we do call for the Audit Commission to go, the report – Leading from the front – is a wider framework for reform, which emphasises the need to empower professionals and the people they serve. It is clear that we are unlikely to ever agree on the issue of axing the Audit Commission, but his critique misses the point.

First, we do not claim that auditing costs £35bn a year; what we say is that the general explosion in quangos costs that much (the lowest figure discussed and in line with the government’s own estimates.  The Taxpayers Alliance, on the other hand, estimate a cost from quangos at around £60bn).  We use this figure to illustrate the changing shape of public service. We do, however, point out that the six largest auditors cost the taxpayer around £1bn a year.

Secondly, we do not call for an end to public service accountability.  This is not because we ‘got cold feet’; it is because we believe that autonomy and accountability go hand in hand.  What we object to is the kind of accountability that David Walker and his colleagues provide.  The Audit Commission is a centralised, remote and process-obsessed behemoth.  It is a symptom of the mistrust and suspicion with which our leaders treat our public servants; David is right that this applies as much to Margaret Thatcher and John Major as to Tony Blair and Gordon Brown (indeed, we make that point repeatedly in the report).

We call, instead, for a more nuanced mix of accountability strategies: strengthened local-democratic control, market mechanisms where appropriate and single-measure outcomes in services where, by necessity, central government must be involved.  David Walker seems to think that, in being realistic about the complexities involved in reform, we are being somehow cowardly. Nothing could be further from the truth. It would have been easier, simpler and more media friendly for us to pretend that there was a simple solution to the malaise that afflicts our public servants. We chose instead to approach the problem holistically and to try to find realistic, workable solutions.

If we want to achieve excellence in our public services, a goal that I’m sure the Audit Commission would subscribe to, we must engage in debate about how to get there.  The Progressive Conservativism Project has contributed to that debate by laying out our view for all to see. The response from David Walker seems to be wholehearted endorsement of the status quo. But, after all, turkeys don’t vote for Christmas.

Max Wind-Cowie is a researcher on the Progressive Conservatism Project at Demos. This blog also appears on the Demos website. Leading from the front was published on September 22
www.demos.co.uk/

Did you enjoy this article?

AddToAny

Top