[Skip to content]

Public Finance logo
News and expert comment on public policy and finance
Public Finance Facebook Public Finance Twitter Public Finance YouTube
.

‘Don’t meddle with council tax freeze’, Pickles warns FDs

By Richard Johnstone | 27 January 2012

Eric Pickles has warned local government finance officers that they risk getting involved in politics if they recommend a council tax rise in their areas.

Eric Pickles
Eric Pickles: finance directors need to do the 'right thing' and freeze council tax Photo: PA

The local government secretary today told the Local Government Association's finance conference in London that a council tax freeze was ‘the right thing’ when public sector workers face both a pay freeze and an increase in pension contributions.

The government has offered £805m to extend this year’s freeze into 2012/13. However, a number of councils have said that they could refuse the offer, equivalent to a 2.5% council tax increase, as the funding is not going to be part of the councils’ baseline funding settlement in future years.

The freeze for 2011/12 was accepted by all councils and has been included in council’s settlement for the period of the Comprehensive Spending Review up to 2014/15.

Pickles today said that ‘council finance officers and councillors need to realise that the council tax freeze is so important for families of all backgrounds and jobs’.

Addressing finance directors directly, he said they have to ‘help councils to do the right thing’.

It is a ‘ludicrous argument’ that the freeze would not be part of the base funding in future years. The ‘whole idea’ of the freeze is to get the council is to ‘get [councils’] base down’, he said.

The government has told councils that if they raise the tax by 3.5% or more then they will need to ask local people to back the decision in a referendum.

Pickles told the conference that a decision to reject the freeze cash, but increase tax below the level that would trigger a local vote, would be a ‘highly political decision’.

He added: ‘Particularly to finance officers, there is a danger here of being involved in politics, in a way. There is a referendum [trigger], and to suddenly find yourself mysteriously arriving in that place between zero and where you have to face the electorate is a highly political decision.

‘It would seem to me that councillors that take decision would be advised to move over and let the finance directors run their councils.’

Pickles also said that he is ‘pretty close’ to awarding funds from the £500m Growing Places fund, which was announced in September. He said that this funding will be provided ‘free of red tape’, and, if councils manage the cash well, would lead to much fewer conditions being placed on government funds in the future.

‘Deliver on this and the amount of strings that we will [place] on offers will evaporate,’ he said.

He added that plans for whole-place Community Budgets would be extended to all councils in future. The four pilot schemes that are currently being developed would ‘influence what happens in every area in time’, with increased local control.



Spacer
CIPFA logo

» Indicates required fields

Daily news email
Public sector updates direct to your inbox
PF Jobsite logo

Latest vacancies

Events

Comments
It is Eric Pickles who is overtly attempting to politicise officer independence!
As for the implicit threat that if Council's don't do what he wants they will suffer seems well short of equitable and symptomatic of throwing the toys out of the pram.

steve couper (27/01/2012 16:05:39)

Surely it's the members who decide,and officers who present options and implement?

Ian Speed (27/01/2012 16:09:32)

The Govt has already reduced the formula grant and stands by the CT freeze policy to get the baseline down even further. All the CFO's I've met are intelligent people and he thinks by addressing them they will see the error of their ways hmm. It sounds more like an attempt to bully council's into towing the line rather than allow local democracy to make their own decisions.

Stephen Reimer (29/01/2012 22:00:33)

I am appalled that an elected politician should be suggesting the abrogation of elected democracy in this way. It is a dangerous and uncertain path to tread in moving away from democracy in this way. I fear for the future in Greece and Italy where the democratic process is being sidelined & do not want to see us going down the same path.

David Whitehouse (30/01/2012 11:07:16)

"Addressing finance directors directly, he said they have to 'help councils to do the right thing'. "

What is the 'right thing' - I presume that he means fall into line with what the government wants. It is the responsibility of officers to remain apolitical and present options (& consequential implications) to the elected members for THEM to decide upon. Does he not see the irony in that he is encouraging officers to become involved in the politics by what he is suggesting that they do!!

Lisa Adams (01/02/2012 13:34:44)

The FD has a professional duty to advise the Council. That advice may include a recommendation on the impact in future years of not increasing the Council tax this coming year. It would be a failure of duty NOT to advise on the full implications, next year and later, of options to be considered.
The Council quite rightly can adopt that advice but equally may choose not to do so. If Pickles offer was worthy of support Council's will adopt it but as many know it isn't that attractive. Even some Conservative lead Councils are thinking twice about the Governments offer - so don't go blaming FDs.

mike stirland (10/02/2012 16:00:11)