Big Society 'faces civil service barriers'
By Mark Smulian | 23 September 2011
The lack of a reform programme
for the civil service will doom to failure the radical ambitions of the government’s
Big Society approach, MPs have warned.
The influential Public Administration Select Committee
has called for ‘a clear change programme’ for government.
The PASC’s report, Change in government: the agenda for leadership, published
on September 22, says: ‘The government has not got a change programme. Ministers
just want change to happen, but without a plan, change will be defeated by
inertia.’
The committee said the twin policies of the Big
Society and localism demanded ‘a more transparent and flexible civil service with
a new role of commissioning public services from charities, social enterprises,
mutuals and private companies’.
But Whitehall lacked these skills and little effort
had been made to equip civil servants with them, the MPs found.
Government had ‘failed to recognise the scale of
reform required,’ the report said.
‘As a result, key policies like the Big Society
agenda and decentralisation will fail.’
The committee called for the establishment of a
corporate centre led by someone ‘with the authority to insist on delivery
across the civil service’.
MPs also found ‘a wealth of evidence’ that Whitehall
departments lacked expertise and specialist knowledge and did not have ‘the
confidence to make decisions and implement them quickly’, while the
government’s approach to tackling this skill shortage ‘falls short of what is
urgently required’.
Committee chair Bernard Jenkin said change should be
driven by Whitehall’s top management but ‘this only appears to be happening in
very few departments’ with no machinery to pass on their experience to weaker departments.
He complained that civil servants' usual response to
change was that, ‘they keep their heads down until the latest reform has passed
over, and then carry on as before’.
A Cabinet Office spokesman said: ‘We are working
with departments to make the civil service smaller, flatter, more fluid and
integrated, more entrepreneurial and innovative, with stronger professional and
commercial skills and more rigorous performance management.’