By David Williams
7 July 2010
Councils should brace themselves for central government
funding cuts of up to a third, a report released today warns.
Analysis of last month’s Budget by the New Local Government
Network concludes that cuts of around £12bn a year are likely, amounting to
around a third of the Department for Communities and Local Government formula
grant.
The grant represents around 80% of local authority income,
and a reduction on that scale would lead to cuts in frontline services or new
charges being introduced, the think-tank says.
Nick Hope, author of Scanning
financial horizons, recommends that councils be given more financial
certainty from Whitehall, and complete freedom over raising council tax. He
also argues for funding to be channelled through ‘place agreements’, along the
lines of the Total Place pilots, pooling cash for councils, health trusts and
police authorities.
Hope added that the £1.165bn cuts already imposed this financial
year were ‘relatively small compared with the tsunami of funding cuts that will
hit councils over the course of this Parliament’.
The formula grant has so far escaped any government reductions,
but is expected to come under scrutiny in the autumn’s Comprehensive Spending
Review.
Councils fear they will have to make big cuts. Most chief
executives and finance directors surveyed for the research believed they would
need to cut their budgets by 20%–25%, while a third expected an even tighter
squeeze.
The survey also found that environmental services, such as
street cleaning and waste collection, and cultural services like museums and
libraries, would be first for the chop.
Responding to the report, local government minister Bob
Neill did not contradict the £12bn figure.
‘This is an opportunity to both decentralise power, and to
save taxpayers’ money through more joint working, professional procurement and
greater transparency,’ Neill said.
‘The government will work with councils to defend frontline
services such as bin collections, as evident by our reduction in the red tape
of ring-fencing, and protecting the formula grant.’