The 2019 Spending Review can’t come soon enough

14 Mar 18

This year's Spring Statement was a ‘non-event’ and showed the chancellor is still trapped in a ‘reactive spending cycle’ - next year's Spending Review is his chance to change all that, says the Institute for Government's senior researcher Emily Andrews. 

NHS: stressed doctor

 

The chancellor’s ‘Tiggerish’ mood could not disguise the essential dullness of yesterday’s Spring Statement. We were promised a boring non-event, and that’s what we got.

Despite the improvement in the public finance forecasts, the chancellor stuck to his guns and made no new spending announcements in his 20-minute speech.

Phillip Hammond is determined to see public debt figures fall. But the new OBR figures only put it at 1% lower than the November forecasts – not enough headroom, it seems, to fund a spending spree.

He left himself some room – maybe, possibly, if the improvement in the public finances continue, and the stars align – to put a bit more cash into services at the Autumn Budget.

But he made clear that his sights are set on the Spending Review, slated for 2019.

There’s no question that a renewed, strategic approach to public service spending and reform is needed.

As our Performance Tracker shows, the short-term efficiency strategies which have been pursued since 2010 – staff cuts, pay restraint, and hard spending limits handed to service providers – have long since started to run out of steam.

A comprehensive spending review is sorely needed to return health, care, and local government services in particular to a sustainable trajectory.

That spending review must avoid the pitfalls of 2015: when layers of individually defensible assumptions accumulated into over-optimistic spending plans, and key warning signs of service deterioration were ignored.

It must be based on a thorough assessment of demand, staff and quality pressures.

It should be backed by genuine reform plans.

And, ideally, it needs a clearly articulated vision for the kind of services this government intends to provide, to tie it all together.

That’s the medium-term answer.

But there are some immediate pressures in services which will only worsen in the run-up to 2020, when that 2019 money will be paid out.

The NHS provider deficit for 2017/18 is set to be nearly double what was planned.

Headline waiting times targets for A&E and elective treatment are getting further out of reach, while demand continues to rise.

In the latest quarter, there were 2,225 assaults on prison officers, a 189% increase from 2009, and a record high.

The 2019 Spending Review is the Chancellor’s opportunity to break the reactive spending cycle that – arguably – he inherited from his predecessor.

But right now he is still trapped in it.

That may well mean more emergency cash injections on the horizon before the year is out.

Did you enjoy this article?

AddToAny

Top