[Skip to content]

Public Finance logo

News and expert comment on public policy and finance

Public Finance Google plus Public Finance Facebook Public Finance Twitter Public Finance YouTube
.

NHS investing £1.2bn to raise care standards post-Francis

By Richard Johnstone | 25 April 2014

Nearly £1.2bn will be spent across the NHS to improve patient care following the public inquiry into failures at the Mid Staffordshire hospital trust, a survey has found. But the poll of NHS hospital trusts and foundation trusts by the Foundation Trust Network warned the extra costs were likely to push some into deficit for the first time.

Nearly £1.2bn will be spent across the NHS to improve patient care following the public inquiry into failures at the Mid Staffordshire hospital trust, a survey has found. But the poll of NHS hospital trusts and foundation trusts by the Foundation Trust Network warned the extra costs were likely to push some into deficit for the first time.
Photo: iStock

According to the survey of 50 foundation trusts or aspirant trusts, £712m had been earmarked for care improvements in 2014/15 to implement the recommendations of the Francis report into care failings at Mid Staffs. This follows £450m spent in the previous financial year.

At least 90% of this investment is being spent on extra staff, particularly nurses and also comes in response to the new inspection regime introduced by the Care Quality Commission watchdog, the poll found.

Foundation Trust Network chief executive Chris Hopson said the spending would improve care, but warned some hospitals would run deficits for the first time, as the cost of improvements were not being fully met by government.

For example, a £150m increase in the NHS payment tariffs paid to acute trusts in 2014/15, known as the service development uplift, only covered around a quarter of the actual cost of the improvements being made.

According to the poll, 100% of the acute trusts surveyed were either not confident or unsure whether these costs would eventually be covered by the tariff or local agreement with commissioners. This was also the view of 80% of non-acute trusts.

Further costs were being incurred as a result of the government’s NHS Mandate, which sets out planned health service improvements, such as introducing seven-day services and moving to integrated care models.

These unfunded spending increases were taking a toll on hospital trusts, Hopson stated.

‘Our members tell us that they are being asked to absorb rising demand; realise annual efficiencies at a level no other Western health economy has ever consistently achieved; potentially take a further £2bn out of NHS acute care for the Better Care Fund in 2015/16; and, now, pay for a range of mandated new service improvements themselves on top of all this,’ he said.

‘This will require difficult choices. For some, it will mean going into deficit for the first time.’

He called for the Department of Health to adopt a different approach to paying for service improvements in response to the squeeze, including full funding any changes included in the mandate. Higher costs as a direct result of the Francis report should also be reflected in either future service development uplifts or higher tariff prices, and there should also be clear, realistic and detailed plans to realise any projected efficiencies.




Share this article here:




CIPFA logo

» Indicates required fields

PF Update
Public sector news direct to your inbox
Are you a CIPFA member? »
PF Jobsite logo

Latest vacancies

Comments
A pricing structure was introduced so that funds flowed with patient care but clearly it isn't sensitive enough to quality standards now being required.
Surely it is possible to determine tariffs at the required quality care level and to fund accordingly. Efficiency savings required, where the Trust's current costs exceed that tariff , are then automatically in-built into the formulae and so funding isn't the issue but local cost control.

Currently Trusts do have a sound complaint because procedures are not correctly priced nor bundled together fairly.

Commissioners want quality care but seem to keep looking for cheaper alternatives through the cherry picking of "any qualified provider" and then don't understand why what is left to be provided by NHS Trusts will cost more than past "average" prices.



Mike Stirland (25/04/2014 17:06:52)