[Skip to content]

Public Finance logo
News and expert comment on public policy and finance
Public Finance Facebook Public Finance Twitter Public Finance YouTube
.

Clear accounts clutter, councils told

By Nick Mann | 18 January 2012

Councils should make their accounts more understandable and accessible by reducing ‘clutter’ and using summary financial statements to communicate with councillors and residents, according to the Audit Commission.

Spreadsheet
Photo: Shutterstock

In Let’s be clear, the commission says some accounts are so complex even professional local government accountants have difficulty understanding them.

It says the average length of local authority statutory accounts is 113 pages. The move to International Financial Reporting Standards in 2010/11 has, according to some, made the situation even worse, the auditors say.

It wants local authorities to work with professional bodies and auditors to address the problem urgently.

‘The story accounts tell about the financial position and financial performance of an authority must be communicated more effectively to a more generalist interested audience, including councillors and local people.’

In the short- and medium-term, those preparing accounts should ‘look critically’ at the previous year’s accounts. ‘They should identify how these accounts could be sharper and more focused before starting work on the next set,’ the briefing explains.

CIPFA and practitioners could also do more to encourage auditors and preparers of accounts to reduce clutter in statutory accounts. The commission suggested they adapt and apply an improvement programme similar to Cuttingclutter, published by the Financial Reporting Council in April 2011.

Councils should also be given the option to issue summary financial statements, it adds, noting that these are increasingly used in the private sector to provide information to shareholders.

Summary financial statements, in plainer and more accessible language, could be the main way of communicating key information more effectively to a wider audience,’ the briefing says.

Further gains could be made by exploring how to use summary financial information more effectively in support of more general reports issued by local authorities. The commission says work being undertaken by CIPFA is helping councils to tailor locally developed arrangements in this area.

In the longer term, steps could be taken to address complexities caused by the requirement for councils to reconcile the accounts they produce in accordance with Generally Accepted Accounting Principles with the government’s control framework.

This currently requires a series of ‘difficult to explain’ adjustments to smooth the impact of spending on council tax, but could be ended by a move towards only using GAAP-based reporting.

The commission noted, however, that making this change in one step would have added ‘several billion pounds’ to council tax bills, based on 2010/11 accounts. Instead, it said a ‘phased’ approach to the change could be used.

Paul Mason, CIPFA's assistant director for professional standards, welcomed the publication of the briefing.

‘CIPFA is committed to working with the regulator, practitioners, auditors and other stakeholders to realise improvements in local authorities’ financial statements,’ he said.


Spacer
CIPFA logo

» Indicates required fields

Daily news email
Public sector updates direct to your inbox
PF Jobsite logo

Latest vacancies

Events

Comments
This must be the most bizarre article I have read in years!

The 'clutter' has been foisted on us by the Accounts and Audit Regulations and then by GAAP followed by IFRS.

The actual accounts are already heavily summarised, especially the Cost of Services part. It is the compulsory notes that fill up the majority of our 176 pages, not the actual accounts.

We don't prepare anything under GAAP these days, it has been superseded by IFRS.

The suggestion that we should, somehow, by stealth, add billions of pounds to council tax just because the adjustments between IFRS (not GAAP) based accounts and statute are "difficult to explain" is little short of bonkers! Fortunately Mr Pickles and co will see that straight away.

IFRS compliant published accounts (and any summaries based on them) are a complete waste of time as far as the general public are concerned. If they really want to know anything about our accounts the Freedom of Information Act is easily their best route.

Mike Keene (18/01/2012 20:52:11)

Many thanks to the Audit Commission for saying what many would regard as a fundamental way to concentrate on improving the understanding of financial reporting and management. CIPFA would do well to revisit earlier papers on this very subject. Future focus should be on 'big-picture' reporting and providing greater emphasis on financial forecasting.

Rheon Tomos (19/01/2012 09:30:46)

What a front the Audit Commission has bearing in mind that they played a leading part in the process by which the accounts got more complex in the fist place!

Interestingly the Audit Commission paper still envisages Councils doing an ununderstandable set of accounts as well as an understandable version! Yet more work and more audit fees to ensure consistency between the two versions.

We should be going back to first principles on our accounts with the aims to simplify and to reduce the time spent on producing tomes that only auditors read.

Jim B (19/01/2012 15:50:34)

Oh how I agree with Jim B. After a working lifetime spent in financial accounting it grieves me to be approaching retirement with our financial accounts in such a state of unintelligability. And who is absolutely responsible for this? Why, CIPFA, closely aided and abetted by the Audit Commission!

Mike Keene (19/01/2012 20:30:32)

The title of this article brought back memories of many hours spent in the basement of Leeds Civic Hall trying to find the original cost of the land for a council houses built in the early 1920s, sold in 1972 so that so that and early £4:3sh.7d. could be repaid to the Consolidated Loans Fund. At that time the loan sanction period for housing had been 60 years.

Peter J Rice (20/01/2012 12:47:39)