By Vivienne Russell
17 November 2010
Public sector organisations will be expected
to accept bids from employees who want to turn services they provide into
mutuals, Cabinet Office minister Francis Maude announced today.
The government is to roll out a new ‘Right to
Provide’ across the public sector. This will put an onus on public bodies to accept suitable
proposals from frontline staff who want to take over services.
A £10m fund has been set aside to help
fledgling public service mutuals get off the ground. A ‘challenge group’ of
employee-ownership experts, including representatives from the John Lewis
Partnership, has also been established to investigate ways to improve
regulation.
Speaking this morning, Maude said: ‘This is
part of the Big Society approach to public service reform, devolving power to
people on the front line who know how things can be done better. The Right to Provide
will challenge traditional public service structures and unleash the pent-up
ideas and innovation that has been stifled by bureaucracy. It will also put
power at a local level so public services will be answerable to the people that
use them.
‘When staff are given a stake in shaping
services, productivity and efficiency has been shown to improve dramatically.
We must not be afraid to take bold decisions that will help create better
public services at a time when there is less money to go round.’
Today’s proposals were greeted with a muted
reaction. Adrian Brown, a fellow at the Institute for Government, said: ‘While employee-owned organisations do tend
to perform better – staff have higher morale, fewer sick days and diversity of
supply in public services encourages competition and better services – it
doesn’t necessarily follow that mutuals free the front line from bureaucracy.’
He added that
creating mutuals was a complicated process, both legally and managerially.
Frontline workers were looking to government to provide clear examples that
relate to their work.
‘We
shouldn’t let the warm, fuzzy feelings that mutuals tend to generate mask the
tough choices and frankly hard work from all concerned, that the mutuals agenda
demands,’ Brown said.
Peter
Holbrook, chief executive of the Social Enterprise Coalition, said the news was
welcome, but added a note of caution.
‘Without the necessary safeguards there is a
danger that the mutuals could be demutualised and sold off to the private
sector, reminiscent of what happened to British building societies in the
1980s,’ he said.
‘It would be criminal to see that happen to our
public services. To prevent this from occurring, all mutuals need to be
asset locked to ensure that they operate for the benefit of the public,
forever.’
Tony Woodley, joint general secretary of the
Unite trade union, gave a hostile response.
‘It
is insulting to think that these DIY co-operatives, set up on the cheap, can
replace a well-established and joined-up public sector… You go to John Lewis to
buy a sofa or a fridge, not to have chemotherapy.’
Health Secretary Andrew Lansley yesterday
announced that 32 NHS projects would
become social enterprises following successful bids from workers.
This followed an
announcement in August when Maude gave the green light to 12
public sector ‘pathfinder’ mutuals.