By Lucy Phillips in Birmingham
5 October 2010
Total-Place style budgeting received a firm endorsement from
local government minister Bob Neill at the Conservative Party conference
yesterday.
Speaking at a fringe event, Neill said the coalition wanted
to follow through with place-based budgeting, which was piloted by the previous
Labour government.
He said: ‘Total Place is very much on the agenda, rebadged
in its new iteration… Joined up public services should not be a question, I
want it to be the norm.’
The ‘next iteration’ might be in the form of ‘community
budgeting’, he said.
Neill added that there was not only a ‘financial imperative’
but he expected ‘we can get better for less’.
The previous government initiated 13 Total Place pilot
projects. While they were largely heralded a success, the exact nature of its
future roll-out will not be clear until after the October 20 Comprehensive
Spending Review.
Neill said place-based budgeting would involve ‘much
cleverer working’ with other sectors, with councils acting as ‘the
commissioner, strategic drivers, and democratic voice’. He added: ‘The days of
monolithic provision by a local authority are gone.’
David Parsons, deputy leader of the Local Government
Association, told delegates that continuing with Total Place was ‘a no
brainer’. He said that after meeting with Chancellor George Osborne, he was
‘hopeful’ that a reference to ‘prototype councils who will begin to develop in
a place much more joined-up cost-effective services’ would be included in the
review.
Paul Carter, leader of Kent County Council, one of the Total
Place pilot areas, said place-based budgeting was breaking down barriers
between services. He warned that the ‘big stick’ for councils to move in this
direction was that they would otherwise go bust.
But John Seddon, chief executive of Vanguard Consulting,
said a cost-based approach to service provision would not lead to savings. He
said councils should concentrate on measuring demand instead, adding that there
was no evidence to suggest shared services and economies of scale led to
savings. ‘The last government had this agenda that bigger is better and the
current government is carrying it on and that worries me,’ he said.
Neill also told delegates that it did not matter that
place-based budgeting was ‘growing up on an incremental basis’. He said: ‘There
will be a bit of a patchwork quilt and I am relaxed about that as it will
reflect the local demand and appetite.’