31 August 2007
The government has stated that it remains committed to reducing carbon emissions despite speculation that it is set to scrap an award-winning, council-driven scheme that encourages greater use of renewable energy.
The Merton rule requires any new commercial-use buildings to reduce carbon emissions by 10% through the use of on-site renewable energy sources, such as solar panels and wind turbines. The scheme was pioneered by the London Borough of Merton and, since its introduction in 2003, 151 other authorities have either adopted the rule or plan to do so.
But fears have emerged that the property industry has succeeded in convincing ministers that the Merton rule is ineffective. New planning guidance on sustainable development being negotiated could effectively abolish the rule if developers get their way.
The Department for Communities and Local Government played down these claims. A spokesman said: 'We want councils to deliver more ambitious carbon-saving measures and set tougher targets for renewable energy for new development, as we move to a zero-carbon culture. Our reforms are about greater use of renewable energy for new developments, not less.'
The Local Government Association said it was reassured by the statement. A spokeswoman said: 'The LGA is pleased… that [DCLG has] no intention of stopping elected council leaders introducing local policies like the Merton rule.
'The LGA would vigorously oppose any change in this position. It would be contrary both to the fight against climate change and the government's stated commitment to letting local councils decide what is best for their residents.'
Housebuilders and property investors have argued that the scheme does little to help tackle climate change. The Property Federation said that it would often be better for developers to focus on energy efficiency and purchase green energy from off-site sources.
PFaug2007
